The path of free physics
I investigate the foundations of theoretical physics, from basic philosophical principles to proposing a better, more logical, coherent, comprehensive, and testable interpretation of physical phenomena. The idea is that the perfection of any theory is illusory, and it is necessary to look for imperfections in the shadows of giants as seeds of improvement and progress.
THE JOURNEY
Science without dogmatism
With over forty years dedicated to searching in the shadows of giants for the flaws in our most "perfect" theories, I have developed a bold, logical, and easily falsifiable proposal for reinterpreting physical phenomena. I will present it gradually through individual articles and in its entirety in my book "In the Shadow of Giants".
Independence from institutions and their rules and dogmas allows for a different and much-needed type of research.
I have a technical degree in chemistry from the Fundação Liberato; incomplete higher education in Electrical Engineering and Physics from UFRGS and in Theology from Seminário Concórdia. My complete higher education is in Law from UNISINOS.
My scientific output is publicly recorded in the Zenodo archive, ensuring universal access. In addition, I use YouTube to reach a general audience.
THE MODEL
The value of direct sponsorship
Autonomous research
Scientific sovereignty
By supporting this project, you directly fund pure theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics. Each article and video published is the result of this collectively achieved intellectual freedom, and every contributor will have their name recorded as a participant.
Open science protects the integrity of findings. Without the pressure for mass publications or artificial metrics, or prior censorship, the focus remains strictly on the pursuit of better interpretations and logic.
Your contribution strengthens the continuity of this independent scientific work, ensuring that new discoveries remain public and accessible to all. Above all, it prevents physics from being restricted to the dogmatism of consensus.